First a few notes:
* Audience = The person you are trying to 'relate' to.
* Speaker = You, the one who is trying to 'relate'.
Let's think about a few scenarios:
- I know how you feel or I understand what you are going through.
- Sometimes people have faced very similar circumstances and can relate or understand, but many times, others simply can't know how we feel until they've actually been in our shoes. Sometimes, it may be beyond their understanding as well.
- I believe when said genuinely, it is a statement designed to convey solidarity, but it said the wrong way it can wring hollow or can even be condescending.
- In other words, you--the speaker--are just trying to hard to stand with them.
- Sometimes, it is better just to quietly stand by another going through trying or tearful times.
- It is important to try to understand yourself and your audience when considering saying this.
- Is there any real possible way you could even remotely know?
- Have you been through a circumstance even remotely close?
- How well do you actually know the person you are considering saying this too?
- Are you close enough that they know what you mean and/or would take it as a solidarity statement?
- Are you just an acquaintance and unsure what your audience is thinking but feel compelled to say something 'appropriate'?
- I can relate to what you are going through (followed by how).
- Sometimes you can relate and sometimes you can't.
- Sometimes your audience just wants to vent or 'cry' and they really aren't looking for your reassurance. They are just looking for a 'pat on the back', not a 'solution' or 'proof' that you know.
- There is a time for serious reassurance and there is a time to just nod or say, "I hear you" or just a hug.
- Maybe your audience does want some reassurance and are open to hearing your situation and how you can make it through tough times.
- Maybe everything will be alright or one day they may feel better, but at the moment your audience may not feel that way. Perhaps they still need to mourn a bit more before they get to a point of being open to hearing someone who has been there.
- There is time to jump in and 'problem solve' and there is a time to let your audience figure out there own path.
- If your audience asks questions about you and a particular situation--in other words, seeks you out-- obviously, they are open to letting you help them.
- If your audience rebuffs moderate attempts to relate, then they probably aren't ready for your assistance.
- Sometimes, as painful as it is, you have to watch your audience make his or her way through their own tough circumstances.
- People process grief and hurt differently, sometimes they have to figure out their own way or pace. You can't artificially impose a deadline or a path for another. You can help, but you can't force it.
- Trying to hard to shield loved ones from the effects of grief and hurt can keep them from gaining the strength they need for future grief or trauma, when they may not have the same 'help' available.
- There is a time to relate and there is a time in which relating could seem like minimizing.
- Age or a similar difference in circumstance could cause a problem in relating.
- People tend to relate better to their own age/circumstance. I believe this is especially true when life experience levels are different.
- Trying to relate could sound like "in my day" or "where I come from" or some similar disconnect. Even if you can see the parallel on the relatable issue, your audience may not. Besides, due to difference in personal circumstances, your audience may not be open to seeing the parallel.
- Perceived expertise or regard could cause a problem in relating.
- Sometimes if your audience hears the same thing from a 'professional', even if you have the life experience to know the same thing, your audience will tend to respond better to the professional. That's why counseling is such an in demand profession.
- If there is a disconnect or block with your audience, you might say the right things, but your audience may perceive it 'not getting me'. Once again, an outsider such as a counselor or minister or highly regarded family or other leader might be the answer as they could be perceived as being more 'objective'.
I could go on indefinitely about mistakes in relating, but I will finish the main part of my post there. Why I called the post "Half a Pie is Still Half a Pie..." is this. I have never had a very close knit family and I barely knew family outside of immediate family. This at points in my life has left a void. Let's face it, for worse or for better, family has an outsized influence on our life. They are our first example and in many cases, strongest example. They are the ones who are expected to be the most loyal and at least initially whom we seek the strongest validation from. Anyway, at times, I have mourned not knowing my extended family and not having a close knit family. I've been told by people a few times in my life that well, that knowing your (extended) family and getting together with family isn't all that it's cracked up to be. In other words, 'having' family is not all it's cracked up to be. To me that has felt tone deaf. I came up with an analogy to express this. Mainly that "Half a Pie is Still Half a Pie". That is, yes, your circumstances aren't perfect either. In other words, your family might have its problems, but they are still a unit and they have some close, albeit, not perfect relationships. In other words, you have half a pie. Some people, for all practical purposes they don't have a family (little overall cohesion with any that they do know and most that they never knew). That would be little or no pie. So, trying to relate by saying, well family isn't all it is cracked up to be seems 'tone-deaf'. Their intentions may be well in stating that, but it doesn't feel relatable. Anyway, this was just an obvious example of where I've seen mistakes in relating.
Just my 1/50th of a $1. As with all my blog posts, feel free to take that which helps. I write them in hopes that it helps people either can find someone to relate to and/or sees a perspective which they hadn't necessarily thought of.
Cheers,
Rich