This is a personal study on codependence, addictive, behavior and human nature in general. Please follow me and feel free to share your experiences and ideas. Please feel free to visit my sponsors if you like what I write. While I'm not in it for the money, it would be nice one day to transition to full-time writing.
You know sometimes you start a blog post about an idea that hits you that you can relate to and before you know it, it becomes deeply personal to the point of being a little vulnerable. But, here goes. As a CSA (childhood sexual abuse) survivor who was raised in a dysfunctional home with alcoholism and domestic violence, I became aware at a young age of idea of powerlessness and the idea of having any control over anything was ridiculous to me. Add to that the fact that our house looked run down and just not generally presentable, that I wore worn clothes to school, that I was bullied and that I never felt like I fit in and then you can see even more clearly why I would feel that way.
Had someone said control starts with you, I would have laughed at them. The idea of 'being in control' would have sounded utterly absurd to me. As previously mentioned, I didn't have control over what I could wear or what eat, the home in which I live in and its state of repair or disrepair. In my house, I didn't have control over the dysfunction--the yelling, the screaming, in some cases the domestic violence. On my person, I didn't have control over the sexual abuse that happened to me and the bullying in the neighborhood and at school. So, to me the idea to me that I controlled anything would have met with like a "yeah, right" type stare. Before I go on, I just want to state that I'm not focused on what I "didn't have" but am setting up a point. I do realize that I am still fortunate in some ways living in the wealthiest country in the world. But, I digress. I didn't realize it then, but I realize these days that in some ways I had much more control than I understood.
Let's move forward into my adulthood. I was always the 'peacemaker' which in some ways is another way of saying "approval seeker" or "people pleaser". I had started that role in my childhood and played that role in my adult life too. It didn't help that I developed a moderate to severe anxiety condition as a 17 year old and as such sought calm as a result. In any case, this desire for approval (or better yet to not be disliked) led me to not properly stand up for myself. I didn't stand up for myself as a kid and as a young adult I continued this pattern. In some ways, I let those closest to me continued to control me by using my need for approval and my need not to be disliked or unwanted. So, in some ways to me it felt like a progression from my childhood with the manipulation and being controlled that was part of needing acceptance.
--
Despite having the sense of 'powerlessness' in my early years and my earlier adulthood, I believe I gradually have awakened to a different view or perspective of control (or power). I used to be view power or control as:
Something that is given or allowed.
Something we have to grab aggressively to gain.
Necessarily involve or interact with that which is outside out.
I've seen the results of a child who had everything taken from him. This child ended up being a bully. He felt like he needed to try to control others to gain control himself. Instead of realizing that he was just a kid and as such his authority was limited, he felt like he needed be pushy with adults to get his way and he needed to demand that he get to do what or get he wanted when he wanted. When he felt his 'authority' being challenged he would get belligerent. When he felt like what he had was at risk, even if that wasn't the case, he felt the need to make proactive threats. In short, he was relying on trying to control others, being aggressive to get and 'keep' power, and blatantly involving outside forces. As you might imagine this didn't work out well for him. If anything he pushed others away, he tended to not get what he wanted in the long run and in many ways lost some of the control or power he had had. In short, he represented the downfall of viewing power the way I had.
As I've grown and matured, I've come to realize that power or control can be:
That which we can implicitly gain or earn.
That which we can find within ourselves.
It isn't necessarily something we are given or allowed, but what we own.
As a teen, when my parents divorced, I was my dad's helper. He wasn't very good at the 'bachelor' thing. I had somewhat taken over cooking near the end of my parent's marriage as my mom spent a lot of time out trying to escape her unhappiness. My dad noted this and when they got divorced, I had 'earned' the role of cooking and shopping. For someone who didn't feel like he had any control that is pretty significant. I had gained my dad's trust in 'taking care of' the house in some ways.
While I've had to push back on family and friends who I felt took me for granted or in some cases took advantage and had to assert control. I've come to realize that control also comes is not necessarily asserting power externally. For this young person I'd met, he often didn't think his behaviors through. He was captive to his emotions. In other words, he wasn't even in control of himself. Often times, control is as simple as making a decision not to let your emotions rule and ruin your day as well as cause conflict. In other words, control in your life is to put yourself in the best position to succeed. When I trained over the summer running during high school, I exhibited control. Running was never easy, especially by myself. But, in order to perform well, I would have to do that which was not comfortable. In a sense, I made a conscience decision to control my actions and in the process exert control over my own future (performance). In short, control here is a conscience decision to what I needed to and try to avoid doing things which were harmful to me.
When my daughter's mom was pregnant with her, often I didn't feel like I was given the respect or taken as seriously as I should have been. I had wondered exactly how I would the "parenting authority". In time, I came to realize it does not have to be something that I would given. Such as voters give to the winning candidate for public office. Nor does it have to be something allowed, like my parents letting me hang out with my friends. What I realized in time was this little person, my infant daughter was learning something profound. In her own infant (and then toddler way), she sensed that her parents were taking care of her, were meeting her needs, we being supportive of her. We didn't really ask for permission so much as we accepted the role of parents. We owned our responsibility. In her own way our baby/infant daughter had learned that she should mind us as she 'knew' that we were there to meet her needs. So, we owned the role and therefore the power or authority that comes with it.
--
So, what is my takeaways?
When someone in your life tries to control you, to a large degree the control over you is what you allow or tolerate from them.
Control doesn't need to be something achieved via threats over others. It is best achieved or earned by doing the right things for the right reason and therefore gaining authority or power with that role.
You can't control how people treat you, but you can control your response. You can influence your outcomes positively with control of yourself.
Anyway, just another perspective on control when others in position of power raise endless sum of money trying to essentially 'buy' it. In many regards we are more free than those who seek to gain power.
Thanks for reading and I hope you took something from it.
Recently with the Coronavirus Pandemic raging, I had custody of my daughter for about five weeks. My daughter was just finishing spring break when her school was shut down for Covid-19. I had/have been working from home since that time myself. Until recently her mom wasn't able to do so. So, she wasn't in a position to do anything except call her during the day to make sure she was on track. Beyond that her mom works at a hospital, so there was initial fear that her mom could get the virus at work and spread it to my daughter. After about 4 weeks of work full-time/homeschool, I was getting stressed out. At that point, her mom asked wanted to switch custody. This would give me a break from working full-time/quasi home-schooling my daughter. Obviously, giving my daughter a chance to see her mom and vice versa was a big part of the equation. However, I paused for a moment and was silently screaming, but I can't give her up now, we are just getting untracked with her e-learning. I knew that wasn't the answer I needed to say. So, I said let's work on a transition.
I felt like over the previous weeks, that we had a system in place that could potentially maximize her productivity. Also, I knew I could help her in some areas which my background is very strong. For example, math is a very strong point of mine. Mostly, I felt like I had a beat on her productivity. I was afraid that she would lose the momentum that she gained with me. In short, I was concerned I was afraid of losing control. My intentions were noble. I wanted her to do well with e-learning and I didn't want her to lose momentum or ready access to my help. My heart was saying 'no', but my mind was saying, 'you really should transition her'.
In my brief flirt with control on the issue (and the lingering feelings), I verified a few things I knew and learned a few more about power and control. So, what did I "learn or relearn" about power, control and human nature.
Power/Control Observations.
-----------------------------------
It is often driven by fear--a fear that you are the only one who can do 'what needs to be done' properly.
Your assessment may not be accurate. Often times there is more than one good solution to a problem.
Your assessment and actions may discourage others from trying to help. Why fight someone who thinks they act as if they are the only one who can do something right?
Uncertainty or inability to 'read' others whom you would be yielding control to. It sometimes doesn't matter if others have shown the capability of being responsible, just the chance that it might not be done right, is enough to 'not risk it'.
When I'm driving, I know what my intentions and what my capabilities are. When you are driving, I can't tell if you are aware of 'how close you are' to the person in front of or if 'know you need to get over' So, I might harp on you about your driving even when you know you have it under control.
When I'm driving, I know where I am going and I know the route to get there. If you have told me where it is and aren't sure if I know, you might to try to back seat drive. The fact is, I might actually have a good idea how to get there and haven't really said anything or asked because I knew how to get there. But your uncertainty might cause you to feel like you need to 'control' the situation and "make sure" I know.
The goal can be or seem noble or selfless.
I just want to make sure it all turns out for the best, especially if I'm very experienced at it.
I'm looking out for 'your' best interest and I'm am willing to help or do the heavy lifting.
The impact however can be negative.
It can discourage the other person from even trying. If you feel like another is micromanaging you and always taking charge on their schedule, it feels like too much trouble to fight assert your role or try.
It can remove the opportunity for the other person to learn from trial and error.
It can remove the opportunity for a solution that is just as good or better to be discovered.
In my story, in my mind,
I was afraid of my daughter losing her progress or momentum.
I was afraid of letting another be in charge of the seeing to it that she got her homework done or the help she needed.
I assumed that my way 'would work indefinitely' and not have it's own drawbacks.
Such as me getting burned out or her resisting my pressure/steps to keep her on track.
Such as she needed not seeing her mom and pets on her mom's side would have no ill effects even if it was just for a few more weeks.
I assumed that no one else could find a similarly effective path towards making sure she was on track.
I had the hubris to think to for a moment to assert that it was MY role as opposed to a shared role. Even if what I felt was true that I might have a little bit more effective way of keeping her on task, I had to accept that the need to exchange custody was greater.
In a matter of moments, I had given up 'control' of keeping her on track (and keeping custody). At first, because I knew I had no right to ask to keep custody so I could oversee her e-learning I acceded quickly to her mom's suggestion. However, I came to realize soon thereafter that it was, for me, a control issue. I hated give up custody. Also, I was nervous that her e-learning momentum could be lost, but I realize that I had to accept the possibility that my daughter would 'fail' at keeping up her e-learning momentum. I realize a number of years ago that "I can't fix everyone", nor should I try. Similarly, I had to accept the fact that I couldn't guarantee what I deemed a 'successful' outcome. To not understand otherwise would be not to understand the idea of letting go of trying to 'control'. I had to let go and let God. I was sad to be giving her up a few days later and I was a little nervous, but I knew in my heart that I was accepting the role that laid out rather than trying to be a control freak.
My wife and I were talking about control freaks we've had in our lives. A common refrain I've heard about controlling people is that they to try to control out of fear. I think there is a large element of truth to that, but I don't necessarily think that all people try to control out of fear or if they do not necessarily do it all the time. I think some people tend to be controlling because 'they can'. That is they like the power of being able to 'control' others. So, it occurred to me how could I differentiate the two? What I came up with is a concept of top down vs. bottom up. So, here is my concepts for what it is worth.
TOP DOWN Controller (Macro)
They may start to exhibit their controlling behavior out of fear, but ultimately when they have gained power, it is to keep or expand their power.
Look to control for power, to dominate others.
Have a greater likelihood of being a megalomaniac.
Often clothe their 'need' for controlling others in being interested in the welfare of others.
Even while expressing their concern for the welfare of others, they themselves seem to find a way to benefit nicely from their use of power.
Have a super-sized ego.
Have the sense that only they know what is best.
Consider themselves as great or greater than their message. In other words, not only do I know better, but I'm also tend to be the best (or only one) to implement what I think is best for everyone.
The ends justify the means in many cases. In other words, while I am not necessarily authorized to exert the power I am--and in some cases it is unethical--I am justified in exerting the power for the 'good of everyone'. In other words, there is an element of malevolence to their attempts to control, even if they don't recognize it.
Control over others tends to be more global rather than situation specific.
BOTTOM UP Controller (Micro)
Tend to control out of fear, rather than a secret need for power.
If I don't do this myself it won't get done (and it may reflect poorly on me).
Yielding too much control can or will make me vulnerable.
Not necessarily addicted to generalized power. Tend to seek control over certain people in certain circumstances.
May have a certain arrogance in their area of control (I know better), but their control is as much to seek some or self-protection (or those they are charged with).
Would tend to have an ability to give up control in areas that they don't care too much about or where they feel reasonable secure.
--
I think everyone seeks some level of control in their life. I think it's common to see oneself as not being controlling at all, but I believe that most people exhibit a certain desire/need to control people and circumstances in their life. In my opinion, where the need for control becomes a problem is:
It interferes with a healthy and respectful relationship with others around you. That is to say there seems to be a need to step on someone's toes because a) a lack of trusting the other to do the right, proper or effective thing b) "knowing" that you can do whatever needs to be done right.
It results in a loss of appropriate freedom and liberty for others.
There are places in life however where control is appropriate and appropriately deferred (and placed in the hand of others):
Adolescents necessarily would tend to have to earn 'control' with responsibility, ultimately deferring control or decision-making to their parents.
Students control to the teachers/staff in adolescences and adulthood defer a lessor degree of control to their professors.
Subordinates, especially as it relates to their employment, would tend to have to defer control or decision-making to their bosses. Similar dynamic with subordinates deferring control to their leaders in the military.
But I digress, even in those cases authority is usually earned.
I don't have a big overarching conclusion to this blog. I would say though that is important to exercise control judiciously where it is given/earned/expected, be willing to defer control where it is appropriate or helpful, and always to remember that control is as much a responsibility as a privilege. It shouldn't be taken lightly and if if mishandled can be subject to being taken away. That being said, I'm deferring control of the words of this blog post to my readers to be used as is beneficial in their lives.
History is littered with what we now consider odd symbols of wealth or success. Being fat used to be a sign of being wealthy especially in accent times, where plentiful or readily available food wasn't always guaranteed. The ability to sneeze upon demand oddly was one too. Sneezing was thought to be a way of clearing one's mind. Those with idle time and/or the money to afford snuff--which could induce sneezing--were typically aristocrats. Interestingly enough, sneezing in conversation was typically considered a sign of disapproval. Hence, "not to be sneezed at", indicated that something was worthwhile. Anyway, when we think about the phrase, "nothing to sneeze at", we think of an amount of money that is significant. But really you could apply that phrase to any measure of success.
When we measure success, we most often think of how much monetary advantage someone has gained. However, as we know that is but one measure of success in a person's life. From my perspective, there are many measures of success and not all traditional. By it's nature, traditional implies long established or understood. So, let's start with the more readily thought of measures.
MORE TRADITIONAL MEASURES OF SUCCESS
Wealth
A person who has a lot of money, especially if they've largely earned it themselves is typically considered successful. Gaining or accumulating a small fortune is not an easy task for most, so society looks upon it as a sign of accomplishment.
A person is considered 'successful' if they can provide a comfortable (aka free of money concerns) for themselves and family. Being able to provide that in death is also a sign of success.
Power
Being able to shape events and shape the world around you is another common sign of success, especially considering those with money can more easily buy influence.
Power, often, but not always, comes in conjunction with having 'made money' or the ability to do so.
I believe in society we tend to admire those who are able to exert control over as many of us feel like we are powerless in the worlds. Typically those who are able to do so have a better chance of making sure they and their friends are 'taken care of' and we hope that they can take care of us (those whom they lead or 'rule' over).
Awards or Achievements
Not everyone can be the best or win at something. We tend to recognize achievements, especially those that are rare and/or above and beyond the norm as indicators of success.
In the NBA for example, there is only one person who is considered the most valuable to their team per year. So, to get that award really speaks volumes about your success, especially where it relates to helping your team.
The Noble Peace Prize likewise is award to person or group every year. So, if you are nominated and win it, it typically speaks volumes about how people value your efforts towards advancing peace.
Typically, but not always, an award or achievement is forever. Therefore, not only will you be recognized at the time it is given, but you will go down in the 'history books' when you achieve or are recognize for greatness.
Fame
Typically, but not always comes with wealth.
Often is associated with some degree of influence or power.
Tends to come with, but not always, awards or accomplishments.
Is a sign of 'relevance'.
While it is probable that being rich will tend to make one more memorable, it isn't a guarantee thereof. While wealth my guarantee some publicity in one's own life or the life of one's own life, it is no guarantee that generations hence that you'll be remembered or even thought of.
Once we get past survival thoughts, I believe there is a spiritual yearning in many if not most people to feel like they matter.
Successful influence.
Even if we don't 'succeed' according to the world's other measures of success, we may be considered successful if our children that we've raised have achieved one or more of the previous measures.
We ourselves can gain some measure of pride if we can claim that we helped our children (or players or students/spouse) to succeed.
LESS TRADITIONAL MEASURES OF SUCCESS
Sacrifice
This may seem counter-intuitive, but sometimes success is sacrifice, especially if that sacrifice was not in vein such as in examples below:
A soldier who dies in the service of his/her country, can through his/her efforts be part of a larger success in military victory and/or keeping us safe.
A fireman who dies in the line of duty--such as on 9/11--while leading other to safety has succeeded in making the world (or his/her part of it) a better place.
A police officer who dies in the line of duty, but helped keep his/her town safe by protecting the citizenry in the process.
Sacrifice can mean giving up of our hard earned time or treasure to help others succeed. If we by our sacrifice help others to succeed, then we have achieved a level of success ourselves. Successfully passing it on.
Survival
This can take many forms some include:
Literal physical survival such as in a battle (such as in war or a personal fight like cancer).
When pinned being enemy lines, being able to make it out alive can be success (a miracle)
When you are deemed to be terminal and given only a short time to live, beating the odds can be a huge success story.
When you have a hard-core addiction, especially one that could be life-threatening, it may not seem like much, but success can be as simple as making it alive and sober another day.
Keeping a roof and food over your head in a bad economic downturn. When you don't know how you'll make it, being able to look back and say, "somehow I made" it is a sign of success at navigating the storm.
Emotionally surviving after an attack or repeated abuse. Sometimes having the strength to endure and to recover without getting destroyed or destroying yourself is a miracle.
Spiritually surviving trying circumstances (such as loss of job, family members or home). Keeping the faith despite the world around you seeming to collapse is not something everyone does.
People who haven't been through the rough times, cannot always appreciate that success in life can be as simple as surviving.
Survival can be a success on the way to other successes (thriving).
Simple Completion
In some ways this can be considered a success or a point just past survival.
Some challenges are so great that we don't have to be the best to be considered a winner or success. Examples are as follows:
Finishing last place in a marathon is in itself a success. Many people either don't finish or never have tried in the first place
A baseball player who makes it to the major leagues for a short stint, never to taste that success again can be considered a success. Especially if/considering:
That player was not considered to have the talent level to make it.
For all those who have played the game, it is a rare class of people that even touch that level of success, even for a moment or brief stint.
Serenity or Spiritual Peace
We may not have the recognition, the worldly 'successes', the praise, the glory or even the simple notes of appreciation, but there is something to be said for being at peace with your Higher Power.
Many people live their whole life, never having achieved any level of serenity or spiritual peace, so achieving it is achieving a success that no other worldly success can match.
Serenity or Spiritual Peace can help us whether storms or lack of 'successes' in other areas of our lives.
Our children, students or players may never achieve pinnacles of the traditional measures of success, but that's okay. Not everyone can be the richest, most famous, most accomplished or powerful.
Our spouse may never be achieve the pinnacle of success, but if we have supported him or her and encouraged him or her to be the best they can be, that is a measure of success.
In a world in which many people crash and burn and fail, leading those under us to well-adjusted lives is in itself "nothing to sneeze at". We can't guarantee them 'worldly success', but we can give them the tools to be well-adjusted.
In this world, we are often pushed by those close to us to succeed according to worldly standards. We are pushed by who are well meaning and by those who live vicariously through us. While it can be a good thing to strive towards the traditional or worldly measures of success, it is important to never forget the more basic and less traditional measures, thereof. Doing so, I believe can help us to be more grounded and can keep us from getting discouraged when we aren't succeeding as well as we'd like by the traditional measures. But, I believe in all our successes we should remember the following:
Never forget those who helped us along the way (especially and including our Higher Power).
It is okay to have some pride in our successful efforts, but it is important not to be too prideful.
Worldly 'success' can be fleeting, so appreciate it while it is there, but always be aware of the the less traditional measures of success which tend to be longer lasting if not eternal.
The measure of who we are is we do with what we have. (Vince Lombardi) We are not guaranteed worldly success by any measure, but I believe we are guaranteed being considered a success by our Higher Power if we do the best with what we are given.